Assessment / sample report card

One child, one year, on a single page.

Brochures describe a programme. A report card shows what happened to a child inside it. This one is anonymised and illustrative, so you can judge the format honestly before anything is signed.

Quick answer

The NASCA annual report card records two assessment cycles against the same six parameters, the projects that produced the evidence, a facilitator note, and the certification level earned from the weighted composite score.

The example below is anonymised. Real report cards carry a certificate ID that anyone can check on the verification page.

Sample document, not a real student record

NASCA annual report card

Student A

Grade 7. Sample partner school. Academic year 2025 to 2026.

Certificate ID
NASCA-SAMPLE-0000
Specialisation
Robotics and Mechatronics, with a Data Science elective
Delivery
NASCA lab facilitator, on campus twice a week
ParameterWeightCycle oneCycle two
Concept20%Level 3. ProficientLevel 4. Advanced
Application20%Level 2. DevelopingLevel 4. Advanced
Structure15%Level 2. DevelopingLevel 3. Proficient
Development15%Level 3. ProficientLevel 4. Advanced
Programming and Analytical Skills15%Level 2. DevelopingLevel 3. Proficient
Presentation15%Level 2. DevelopingLevel 4. Advanced
Composite100%47 / 10074 / 100

Cycle one. October, mid year

Strong grasp of the ideas, weaker at turning them into a plan. Build log started late and was thin.

Level 2. Developing

Cycle two. March, end of year

Two full iterations of the line-follower, with a measured improvement in lap time. Handled panel questions without notes.

Level 3. Proficient

Project evidence

  • Cycle one

    Line-following robot with obstacle recovery

    Built to the taught brief. Worked on a clean track, stalled when the tape was interrupted.

  • Cycle two

    Line-follower version two, with a sensor confidence rule

    Rewrote the decision logic to keep heading when the sensor reading goes uncertain. Lap time on the test track improved from 41 seconds to 27, measured over five runs.

Facilitator note

The change this year was in planning, not in ability. Once the build log became a habit, the work stopped being rebuilt from scratch every fortnight. Next year, push on Structure and Programming. The presentation is already the strongest part of the file.

Annual outcome

61

out of 100, both cycles averaged

Level 3. Proficient

Meets the year standard across all six parameters.

Verifiable by certificate ID

Want to see how the marks behind this page are arrived at, parameter by parameter?

Open the rubric explorer

Questions we get asked

Is this a real student report card?

No. It is an anonymised worked example built from the published rubric, so a school can see the format and the level of detail before committing to anything. Every name and number in it is illustrative.

Who receives the report card?

The school coordinator and the parent, once at the end of each cycle, with an annual consolidated version at the close of the academic year.

Can we print or download it?

Yes. Use your browser print option on this page to save it as a PDF. Partner schools receive the real version as a generated document with a verifiable certificate ID.