Impact

What actually changes for learners and teachers. In numbers, not adjectives.

Every cohort is measured. Every measure is audited. Every quarter we publish what worked, what didn't, and why.

+38%
Avg pre→post assessment lift across 12-week cohorts
92%
Teachers report 'high confidence' to teach AI after training
4.7/5
Average parent NPS across 2,400 surveyed families
18
National & international medals won by learners in 2025

01

Learning gains

MetricResultSample / window
Pre-test → post-test (avg)+38 ptsn = 6,142
Critical-thinking rubric (Grade 6-8)+1.4 levelsn = 1,810
Computational-thinking (Bebras)Top quartile in 71%n = 942
Project completion rate94%across 320 cohorts

02

Teacher impact

MetricResultSample / window
Teachers trained (cumulative)1,260from 100+ schools
High-confidence rating, AI lessons92%post 40-hr course
Repeat enrolment in advanced PD78%year-on-year
NPS from school leaders+62n = 184

03

Pathways & recognition

MetricResultSample / window
Senior learners admitted to top-100 STEM universities47class of 2025
National-level medals (math/CS/robotics)122025 calendar year
International-level medals62025 calendar year
Open-source / capstone projects published210+all years

Method

How we measure (and how we audit).

No black boxes. No cherry-picking. Three rules we never break.

📐

How we measure

Pre/post assessments are standardised per level, blind-graded by an external rubric panel, and benchmarked against published norms (e.g. Bebras, AP, IGCSE).

🔍

Independent audit

Quarterly audit by a third-party education research firm. Their summary letter is included in every PDF download.

🧾

We publish misses too

Cohorts that underperformed our targets are listed in the appendix with our root-cause analysis. Trust comes from showing the bad weeks too.

🏫

For school leaders

Quarterly per-school dashboard with cohort-level outcomes, teacher growth, and parent NPS.

👨‍👩‍👧

For parents

Termly progress card per learner, mapped to international standards plus AI/Maker depth.

🎓

For governments

Aggregated district-level reports designed for policy review and procurement audits.

It's the only programme we run where the data lands in our inbox before we ask for it.

Director of Academics, K-12 group, India · 2025

NASCA Research · 2026 Edition

Get the full audited outcomes PDF.

14 pages · 7 countries · independently audited. Includes per-region appendix and the anonymised cohort dataset for replication.